Skip to main content

Why is a strong opposition a necessary safeguard for democracy?

There are 2 quotes I would like to use to explain myself the first one being. “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely” and the second one being “The road to hell is paved with good intentions”.
An effective opposition is necessary to provide check and balances in the government. The founding fathers of the US realized this and created different levels of government. What they did not foresee is other members using legal but non-ethical methods to prevent a law being passed i.e. filibustering a law. “Talking a bill to death” or “out talking a bill”, with unnecessary talking and time wasting as to prevent actual passing a significant bill or law. An opposition can frustrate the government and prevent any law being passed, hence making it ineffective.
Without an effective opposition the government of the day, becomes dictatorial and unaccountable and could pass laws which favor a selected few or a particular tribe or group. As said “Power Corrupts”, unfortunately it does, the so called kings in the past that were said to be “benevolent”, were actually not exposed to real power. In the 1960′s before the first Nigerian military coup, Nigeria had an effective opposition but due to gerrymandering and divide and conquer tactics, imprisonment of the leader on changes of treason, they were able to destroy the effective opposition. This lead to a coup when the people felt that their grievances were not being addressed, the government had become unaccountable and corrupt, they killed all of those which they believed where corrupt. The killings of the politicians which mainly belonged to a particular tribe subsequently lead to civil war. Although the leader may think he is acting in the interest of the people but if they do not have a say in it, they will feel subjugated.
It is great that a pass or siting leader can be called to address the representatives of the people and is held to account for his actions (Chilcot and Tony Blair).
For any sound democracy it is essential that the people believe that they are free to choose their leaders and have the power to remove them if they find it necessary. The absolute monarch of French King Louis XVII could only be removed by violent means, which lead to the French Revolution with widespread death and destruction. So it is essential that there is an effective strong opposition for people to be given an alternative to the government of the day. When majority of the people decided to leave the EU (Brexit) in the UK, it is essential that this is follow through, although the government was against it. A sound democracy with an effective opposition will ensure the desire of the people is follow through.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The seedling of doubt - Merchants of Doubt

Doubt is the product What this book says, and the film elucidates is there is a selective specific group of "scientists" who have a particular playbook to discredit, confuse and "muddy the waters" against scientific research for their sponsors. What these group of people or interest groups have learned from the days of dealing with the tobacco industry, is that they need not concern themselves with trying to prove anything or to disprove the scientists. All they need is to seed doubt and confusion in the market of public opinion, their main motto is "Doubt is our product". As, when people are confused and the policies are difficult to interpret because they are complicated, ambiguous, inconclusive, etc then there will be great difficulty in organizing widespread opposition to it. They deliberately frustrate governments into inaction, blocking them by using their lobbyist and "experts" and hence stop all ways of finding effective solutions...

The Machines are here

  I do not want to be seen as a prophet of doom. Nor do I see myself as a modern-day Isaiah, Hosea, Jeremiah or Daniel who constantly warned Israel about their behaviour, their worshipping of other false gods, and trying to be like other surrounding tribes until they were conquered by Assyria, Babylon, or Rome. But the issue of AI is evident to me, and I must see it in the face, as I am working in that area. I use it regularly to do my work, and it makes my job more effective and easier. A simple example, I had a meeting with my boss recently, and we talked about technical and other topics. An AI was taking minutes of our more than one-hour-long meeting. In the minutes, the key points we discussed were neatly laid out, including the main points and actions to be taken. The non-work-related stuff was summarised as "discussed weekend plans and shared updates about families, while also discussing the similar nature of political parties and their tendency not to fulfil their promises...

Tracing the American Black culture

This is a fascinating book that presents a different perspective on the generally accepted narrative. Thomas Sowell appears to have done his homework, and the extent of his work supports this conclusion. He has spoken on several topics and presents a conservative viewpoint. Thomas Sowell said in the preface of the book that "the purpose of this book is to expose some of the more blatant misconceptions poisoning race relations in our time." He believes that too much has been assumed and too little has been scrutinised. He is something that is not so common in the United States of America, a Black academic Conservative, as most academicians are Liberal, and a majority of the Black population in the US are Democrats.    Thomas Sowell is an American economist, social theorist, and author, born on 30th June 1930, in North Carolina. Raised in Harlem, he served in the Marine Corps during the Korean War before earning degrees from Harvard, Columbia, and the University of Chi...