I understand that a lot of
Nigerians, believe the that the country was doing better when it was practicing regionalism and we should go back to
it under restructuring. Some people do have a form of nostalgia for
the regions, since we believed that our major infrastructure was built during
this period. I do believe that that might be so, but also there were
problems in these quasi-autonomous entities. There was the issue of
the minorities in each region and what to some seem like healthy rivalry. But
it was not healthy and what lay underneath was deep-rooted suspicions, envy and
jealously. Which could easily have been exploited and manipulated for political
gain, as evident from the riots later, the coup and subsequently the civil war.
The coalition ruling party (Northern and Eastern regions) were able to divide legally
Western Region into Western and Mid-West Regions, after a referendum. This could be said of all the regions, i.e. that
they all had minorities who were just begging to have their own regions as they
felt they were been supressed and dominated by the main tribe in their various Regions.
But since the Western Region was not part of the government, and being in opposition,
in a form of gerrymandering the powers that be were able to reduce the
effectiveness of the opposition.
Nigerian
federalism took firm roots in 1954, when three regions were established in a
federal format for the first time in Nigerian political history. But
since incorporation there were the issue of the minorities, for each group
fighting for their area and share of the “regional cake”. In the North that previous
writers have alluded to, was not one homogenous entity. The North consist of various
tribes brought together by language (Hausa) and religion (Islam), ruled once by
the Sokoto Caliphate and the Bornu Caliphate in the North East. The British had
a total different relationship with it’s Northern Nigeria Protectorate, and the
British kept intact the native authorities and their system, because there was difficulty
in tax collection. Even as at then, there was a shortage of staff and revenue
for public projects in the North, Lord Lugard corrected the disparity in 1914
with unification, hence the custom revenues from the South were paying for projects
in the North. The strange relationship the ruling British Authorities had with
the Northern leaders, Lord Lugard had promised the Emirs “to keep the
missionaries out of the emirates”. “The colonial regime also feared that
missionary activities in the emirates might lead to Mahdist outbreaks or
religiously inspired political uprisings”. This was unfortunate, because the
missionaries brought western education and as at the time of independence the South
had far more graduates and “educated” personnel than the North. The kano riots
1953, was because the Northern delegates were against Nigeria having
independence in 1956. Hence, the North fearing dominance by the South had
delayed independence, and later instituted Quota system and Federal Character.
And you can see that things have not changed.
There
is a different group calling for restructuring and another saying we should not
have it. I believe that it is like pre-independence that we feel that us
gaining independence will solve all our problems. Majority of the those that
are petitioning for restructuring are from the South. And those that are refusing
are for the North. Most of the states from the South have the population and
the means to be self-sustaining as the have very high IGR. The infrastructure and facilities available in
the South is way ahead. Despite the having quota system and federal character,
the North has only been able to fill their elites while the rest suffers. Bill
Gates traveled to Nigeria and over a decade spent $1.6 billion there
successfully eradicating polio in North Eastern Nigeria, which had reemerged.
Bill Gates gave statistics about Infant mortality rates, chronic malnutrition, maternal
mortality rates, etc but it far worst in the North than in the South. As seen by the health map and it is for all indices and measurements. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/health-map/nigeria
As some people are saying that the 3 regions
no longer suffice as some areas no longer can work under others. Some people suggest that we should go for 6 geopolitical regions.
But when you look at the revenue of the 6 none of them are economically viable as in 2016. But recently that has changed, with only the South West being viable. A lot of people believe it is the way forward, and only time will tell. There is the issue of of cattle rearers, desert encroachment, Sharia law in some states or regions, etc. In addition the issue of migration from the less economic areas to the prosperous regions, these with religious differences maybe we have opened Pandora's box.
But when you look at the revenue of the 6 none of them are economically viable as in 2016. But recently that has changed, with only the South West being viable. A lot of people believe it is the way forward, and only time will tell. There is the issue of of cattle rearers, desert encroachment, Sharia law in some states or regions, etc. In addition the issue of migration from the less economic areas to the prosperous regions, these with religious differences maybe we have opened Pandora's box.
Comments
Post a Comment