Skip to main content

A new way of thinking - The Taranto attack a prelude to Pearl Harbor

There is a book that I am currently reading, about gaining insights and a new way of thinking. Among its numerous examples, it gives that of the British attack on the naval base at Taranto, a coastal city in southern Italy on the night of the 11th of November, 1940. France had already surrendered on the 25th of June, 1940. The US had not yet entered the war, hence only Britain was fighting Germany, Italy and Japan.  This attack was seen as revolutionary, a change in the current general thinking and a different approach to warfare. This is the first time an attack from an aircraft carrier by planes on other ships. The first all-aircraft ship-to-ship naval attack in history, employing 24 obsolete Fairey Swordfish biplane torpedo bombers from a new aircraft carrier HMS Illustrious in the Mediterranean Sea. The plan for this attack had been on the books since 1935 when Italy invaded Abyssinia (Ethiopia). It was thought that ships were safe in a harbour which was less than 50 meters deep, as any torpedo from an aeroplane had to drop at least 30 meters (98 feet) in the water for it to be effective. But the British had found a way to make sure that the torpedo did a belly flop instead of a nose dive, hence it will appear to shimmed off the surface of the water. They attached wires to the nose and added wooden fins to the tail to make sure they stabilized near the surface of the water and did not sink too deep. The attack was at night and it destroyed half the Italian Mediterranean fleet in one single blow.


Immediately after hearing of the attack, Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto saw the potential and importance of the British attack on the Italians. In retrospect, they should have all known that arranging all your ships in one place anywhere is too big a temptation for your enemy in times of war and protecting them by having anti-submarine nets at the mouth of the harbour is not enough. He immediately began to think about the American Pacific fleet anchored at Pearl Harbor. Yamamoto was against Japan's expansionist policy and was against the war in the Pacific in general. He knew that once he had drawn up plans for the attack they would lose a long drawn-out war, hence the attack had to be so severe that it would knock out any potential of the US fighting.

The Japanese had an aggressive foreign policy and defeated the mighty Russian Empire in 1905 against its expansionist policy. The Japanese Empire had a surprise attack on the Russian fleet at Port Arthur, China after negotiations had broken down.

The attack at Pearl Harbor itself had its challenges as it was during the day and not at night as the British at Taranto had done. Also, the Japanese lacked the precise bombing equipment the British had. There was the issue of the vast distance of about 6,400 Km (4,000 miles) to be covered to and also fro. 


Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto

Another person who had immediately grasped the importance of the attack at Taranto was Admiral Harold Stark Chief of Naval Operations, he then wrote a memo warning of the potential of an attack at Pearl Harbor to the Secretary of the Navy, Franklin Knox. Advising to put torpedo nets in the Harbor itself. But this fell on dead ears, as there was a general belief that since the water was so shallow, and the distance so great the Japanese would not risk such an attack despite there being hostilities between the two countries. Insight doesn't count for much if we cannot transfer them into action. Stark's bosses deflected and ignored his warnings and after the Pearl Harbor attack, he was quietly transferred to the Atlantic arena of operations. 

Image result for admiral harold stark
Admiral Harold Stark
Both Admirals either due to experience or knowledge understood immediately the importance of the Taranto attack. But only one was able to implement change and the other faded into obscurity. The Japanese continue with attacks throughout South East Asia taking over most of the British, French, Dutch, and other European colonies. They continued with their progress till Midway in June 1942 when the US put them on defence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The seedling of doubt - Merchants of Doubt

Doubt is the product What this book says, and the film elucidates is there is a selective specific group of "scientists" who have a particular playbook to discredit, confuse and "muddy the waters" against scientific research for their sponsors. What these group of people or interest groups have learned from the days of dealing with the tobacco industry, is that they need not concern themselves with trying to prove anything or to disprove the scientists. All they need is to seed doubt and confusion in the market of public opinion, their main motto is "Doubt is our product". As, when people are confused and the policies are difficult to interpret because they are complicated, ambiguous, inconclusive, etc then there will be great difficulty in organizing widespread opposition to it. They deliberately frustrate governments into inaction, blocking them by using their lobbyist and "experts" and hence stop all ways of finding effective solutions...

The end of a massive killer - The Malaria vaccine story

  A program on BBC iPlayer tells the story of the search for the first Malaria vaccine. T his is an exciting story. It has everything, from an exciting detective story to romance, horror, thriller, and finance. The individuals involved go from country to country, from London, Oxford, and New York to Villages in Africa and India. It involves multi-million organisations and sole individuals working against the system. It is recorded that one child dies every minute from Malaria, and it is a significant killer in a large number of countries. This program tells the story of how the Oxford University Team, the same team that developed the COVID-19 vaccine AstraZencetra as part of the Academic Vaccine Development Program. They had produced about 3 billion doses and had been used in 170 countries. This was also helped by a grant from the EU. Malaria was endemic throughout the Western world. It got its name from Rome.  The "bad air" ( Medival Latin' mala aria' ) surrounding ...

Further explaination of the universe

  Stephen Hawking, a theoretical physicist, cosmologist, and author, has always tried to explain complex astrophysical phenomena in simple language that everyone can understand. The subtitle of this book is "a further explanation of a science classic made more accessible". To his surprise, his book A Brief History of Time was a bestseller and was on the top ten list for 237 weeks and sold one copy for every 750 people on Earth. The book was a remarkable success for a modern physics book. Many people were asking for a sequel to the book. A Brief History of Time explained how Newtonian Astrophysics described the laws that control planets and stars' movement. This book takes into consideration the most recent theoretical and observational results. How light speed is finite and constant at 299,792,458 m/s. Since the speed of light is constant, to explain the different observations for different observers, time must be relative. Producing the twin paradox, i.e., time slows d...