Skip to main content

Doing my own research!

 When most people say they are doing their "own research" in this time and age, especially on the COVID Vaccine, they do not mean they are all yearning for other phenomena that could have explained the results, sceptical and in a scientific way. All they mean is they are entering into Google the words "COVID Vaccine", and they read up on it. They are not conducting any scientific experiments or collecting data. Unfortunately, most of them are not critical thinking or understand the scientific method. They have primarily been trained in communication, politics, business, accounts, arts, etc. and fail to realize science is a totally different kettle of fish. They are not doing research in the way we scientists would define it passe. They just mean that they would look deeper into it or, in some cases, just look at it again. Concerning the Scientific Method, Aristotle is thought to be the inventor of the scientific method, which analyses logical implications contained in demonstrative discourse, goes further than natural logic and is not dependent on those who philosophized before. The method of thinking is quite different from the average non-scientific trained person, as you have to be sceptical and take nothing for granted. So you will have to review your results and analyze the data.


However, the act of doing your own research involves collecting data (which on its own is done in such a way that it is unbiased and there is less tendency for error, i.e. double-blind study), analyzing it and having an unbiased interpretation of the results. For example, anyone involved in research has to do a mini statistics course first, which will also involve knowing how to read and understand data. You deliberately try to "falsify" your result, i.e., find ways other phenomena could have explained the results. For example, you come across things like the "Null Hypothesis". As a scientist, you have to have a sceptical mind as after your "research", people must be able to duplicate your results from all over the world as long as the conditions have been fulfilled. 



Google algorithm works in the following way: it presents you with what you have been searching on before. Social media gains from you spending as much time as possible on your computer. This is its business model, and it does it for-profit. Social Media companies have found out you become more engaged if an emotional aspect is involved. The system predicts what you would be more interested in based on what you have been searching for and looking at before. For example, if you were interested in Cats before, all the latest Cats videos and downloads would appear on your first page; articles related to Cats, you may have the false impression that everybody is only interested in Cats videos. For example, cats would be bathing, fighting, eating, sleeping, etc. The number may go into hundreds of Cat videos downloaded daily worldwide in China, Japan, the US, the UK, South Africa, etc. You may come down with the impression that everyone else is looking at Cat Videos, that people only download Cat Videos and ask why people only have time for Cat Videos. This is the definition of presenting a biased view, and you will have to be presented with confirmation bias. This can be corrected by resetting Google settings, but few people know how to do this and are uninterested.

Of Course, there is the political element, especially in the US Republican party. A significant subgroup peddles conspiracies about lizard people ruling the world, first world order, QAnon, etc. It was essential for small government and low taxes. There is an Evangelical anti-science movement in the US related to the withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement and has a more introspective view of the world. Their breakthrough treatment for COVID is Colloidal Silver, Ivermectin, Bleach, and Hydroxychloroquine. Of Course, a section of them are more educated and will request Monoclonal antibodies. "Because of their ease of delivery and low cost, the vaccines are going to outweigh [monoclonal] antibodies in many situations". But many people still refuse the vaccines and prefer antibodies and other treatments.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The seedling of doubt - Merchants of Doubt

Doubt is the product What this book says, and the film elucidates is there is a selective specific group of "scientists" who have a particular playbook to discredit, confuse and "muddy the waters" against scientific research for their sponsors. What these group of people or interest groups have learned from the days of dealing with the tobacco industry, is that they need not concern themselves with trying to prove anything or to disprove the scientists. All they need is to seed doubt and confusion in the market of public opinion, their main motto is "Doubt is our product". As, when people are confused and the policies are difficult to interpret because they are complicated, ambiguous, inconclusive, etc then there will be great difficulty in organizing widespread opposition to it. They deliberately frustrate governments into inaction, blocking them by using their lobbyist and "experts" and hence stop all ways of finding effective solutions...
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of a massive killer - The Malaria vaccine story

  A program on BBC iPlayer tells the story of the search for the first Malaria vaccine. T his is an exciting story. It has everything, from an exciting detective story to romance, horror, thriller, and finance. The individuals involved go from country to country, from London, Oxford, and New York to Villages in Africa and India. It involves multi-million organisations and sole individuals working against the system. It is recorded that one child dies every minute from Malaria, and it is a significant killer in a large number of countries. This program tells the story of how the Oxford University Team, the same team that developed the COVID-19 vaccine AstraZencetra as part of the Academic Vaccine Development Program. They had produced about 3 billion doses and had been used in 170 countries. This was also helped by a grant from the EU. Malaria was endemic throughout the Western world. It got its name from Rome.  The "bad air" ( Medival Latin' mala aria' ) surrounding ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Further explaination of the universe

  Stephen Hawking, a theoretical physicist, cosmologist, and author, has always tried to explain complex astrophysical phenomena in simple language that everyone can understand. The subtitle of this book is "a further explanation of a science classic made more accessible". To his surprise, his book A Brief History of Time was a bestseller and was on the top ten list for 237 weeks and sold one copy for every 750 people on Earth. The book was a remarkable success for a modern physics book. Many people were asking for a sequel to the book. A Brief History of Time explained how Newtonian Astrophysics described the laws that control planets and stars' movement. This book takes into consideration the most recent theoretical and observational results. How light speed is finite and constant at 299,792,458 m/s. Since the speed of light is constant, to explain the different observations for different observers, time must be relative. Producing the twin paradox, i.e., time slows d...
Post a Comment
Read more